Meeting Margaret Donnelly & Sticking with Jeff Harris
Margaret Donnelly is running for Missouri Attorney General, and I had the opportunity to meet her yesterday evening. I went with an open mind, because my admiration for Jeff Harris pales in comparison to my desire to keep the Attorney General's Office in Democratic hands. If she proved to be a better candidate than Jeff Harris, I was prepared to get enthusiastic about her.
Suffice it to say, I'm more on board with Jeff Harris than I ever was.
Does anyone remember Geri Rothman-Serot, the St. Louisan who emerged from a 14-sided Democratic primary in 1992 only to lose a Senate race to Kit Bond? Margaret Donnelly is her political reincarnation.
One thing is perfectly clear - Margaret Donnelly is a St. Louisan. When asked how she plans to win the primary, she pointed out that it is a three way race right now, and that St. Louis provides 40% of the primary vote. She managed not to taunt us insignificant backwater hicks with "do the math, rednecks!", but she did say that "her geography" was one of the reasons she is confident she will win the primary. She also relied on quotations from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, and held herself out as the "only player in the St. Louis region" on Medicaid issues.
Like Rothman-Serot, Donnelly has a severe case of 270 myopia. It's a disease that afflicts many St. Louisans, who wind up thinking that St. Charles is the West, Affton is the South, and Normandy is the dangerous North. These people can thrive in their narrow world, but they fail miserably when the rest of the state gets to vote on them.
When asked how she intends to appeal to outstate voters, Donnelly had no real answer. She claimed that her legislative record regarding Medicaid would somehow help her win voters, but was unable to articulate why she thought that would be a major issue for the Attorney General's race, against a candidate who will undoubtedly be smart enough to voice support for health care.
Worse, though, was her attempt to claim that she has adequate experience. She was a family lawyer who handled some juvenile cases. The Attorney General, of course, does not handle divorces. She also showed confusion about the Missouri Plan, pointing to a couple recent rulings by a judge not subject to the Missouri Plan as evidence that the attacks on it are already having a chilling effect. (If you're scratching your head and muttering, "huh?", join the crowd.) (Update: An anonymous commenter correctly points out that her discussion of Judge Callahan makes more sense in the context of the broader attack on the independent judiciary. To be fair, that is probably what she meant, though my question was about the Missouri Plan.)
Margaret Donnelly seems like a fantastically dedicated and fine Democrat. She is not, however, a particularly good candidate for Attorney General. She has no relevant experience, and she does not project the toughness and solidity Missourians want to see in their chief law enforcement officer. She seems to think that Clayton is mid-Missouri.
I've now met all the candidates for the Democratic nomination for Attorney General. They are all good people, but only one has the experience, the outstate appeal, and the Democratic credentials to become our next Attorney General. Jeff Harris is that candidate.
Labels: attorney general, donnelly, Jeff Harris, koster

51 Comments:
Donnelly or Harris? That is really a non-issue, no? Sen. Koster will win the primary and is the only Democrat who can win the general.
Donnelly or Harris? That is really a non-issue, no? Sen. Koster will win the primary and is the only Democrat who can win the general.
It's not a non-issue, because Koster won't get through the primary. Face it - the guy's not a democrat or a republican - he's an opportunist. While he does have some union support, the unions are worthless as political support anymore.
How in the world will Koster explain his rightwing voting pattern in the primary?
anon at 9:59 - I think unions are quite important in the primary, and less so in the general.
In a three-or-more-way primary race, unions will have a significant impact.
The chilling effect of attacks on the Missouri Plan on non-plan judges makes sense to me. The attacks on the Plan are part of a larger assault on the independent judiciary. I imagine a few Plan judges were nervous when Roe took out that Cole County judge. If someone declares open season on the judiciary, the non plan judges are more vulnerable. I have no idea if the specific example she gave made any sense, but the general reference didn't make me scratch my head.
Sophia - you make a good point, and that was probably what she was trying to express. Maybe I was just a little slow on the uptake.
Great write up Dan. I couldn't agree with you more about Donnelly. She's been a great state rep, but there's a reason why she wasn't elected Minority Leader and Jeff Harris was. The guy is a leader and he will get things done as Attorney General. Donnelly is toast in a general election.
As for Koster, there's no way he's going to win the primary. He's wrong on too many issues. And just because some union leaders have endorsed him doesn't mean the rank and file will follow suit. The more Democratic voters learn about Koster the less there is to like. In the end, I suspect some union bosses will be embarrassed that they turned their backs on the proven Democrats in the race to support the 3rd place candidate.
Koster needs to go home and run for re-election. Then go back to the Senate and make amends for the damage he did as a GOP leader. Until then, I'm sorry, but he just hasn't paid his dues as a Democrat and Democrats shouldn't support him as a statewide candidate.
Whether you like her reasoning or not, she will be the nominee because she is a woman and from St. Louis.
I believe she was talking about Judge Callahan in Cole County and his two recent decisions on school funding and MOHELA. While he is not subject to the plan, one of his fellow judges was defeated last year for being an "activist" by a campaign run by Jeff Roe.
I agree, anonymous. Viewed in the broader context of the attacks on the independent judiciary, her response to my question was better than I described. I'll update the entry when I get home this evening.
While you're at it Dan, why don't you update your "Stumbling at The Gate" post with a few of my suggestions as well?
:o)
3 - Questions:
How many millions in funding to UMKC Nursing School were yanked due to Koster's stopping Justus in a filibuster on MOHELA?
How many union members reside in St. Louis City, the Kansas City Election Board district or Boone County (where the vast majority of votes in a D primary come from)?
If unions are so powerful in primaries, how come Matt Bartle is still a senator?
unions are very important in Primaries.
Matt Bartle is still in office because the demo's in his district are predominantly Republican. How many times has The Shrub been in Lees Summit the past several years? Twice.
Of course the difference between these two candidates is the issue. It should be the issue for people who realize that they are the only two Democrats in the race. Koster's voting record and actions as a state senator are morally undefendable. Jay Nixon's campaign is promising to fix the very problems that Blunt and his cronies like Koster caused over the past couple of years. You expect me, a true Democrat, to believe that this guy is a Democrat? The proof is in the pudding my friends, and this guy lacks any consistency.
Koster will win because the democrats will see through the course of a primary campaign that neither Harris or Donnely can beat Catherine Hanaway. The fear of Hanaway being the AG will have Yellow Dogs picking the only candiate who has a chance to beat her. I also predict this may be the reason Rudolph Guliani gets the R nomination for President.
Besides now that Koster has reformed, I gaurantee he will be an attack dog against the Republicans. Sometimes the converts are more committed than the faithful.
Koster is not going to make it. He's a slick, amoral Lieberdem. He will be eviscerated at all speaking opportunities for his flip-flopping.
Anonymous -
"Undefendable" is not a word. The rest of your post is also incorrect.
Koster is supported by the unions and the trial attorneys - two very important Democratic interest groups. This guy may have been a Republican, but he voted and acted like a Democrat. Remember the stem cell debate? He alone fought Bartle et al. Democrats need to join together to support Koster! He is the future of the party in this state.
I agree with you, most recent anonymous, that Koster has exactly the same chance in the Democratic primary as Giuliani has in the Republican primary. We disagree only in our measure of that chance. Wanna put up a wager?
Did Koster get a MATA endorsement that I missed?
Being the only woman in a three way primary is a huge advantage, BUT...
1) the rural moderate dems don't trust Koster. Harris has those nailed down as well as Columbia. We're the show-me state, people, Koster's gotta show. Also, they favor white males (sad fact, I know)
2) Koster will be fighting Donnelly for votes in STL. Harris is also gaining support from unions on that side of the state.
3) not all MATA attorneys are behind Koster. ask one of them about a recent email a Koster supporter sent out. Things got a little hairy over the MATA listserv.
4) Dems already beat Hanaway once. We dont need Koster for that.
5) Where's Donnelly's money?
Clearly Harris is the Dem candidate for AG. This is not a typical male-male-female primary. If anyone wants to brush up on their Geri Serot history I recommend David Leuthold's Campaign Missouri 1992.
I'm guessing that most support Koster gets from "trial attorneys" is from the corner of that peculiar breed - the republican plaintiffs attorney. They're more numerous than you'd think. And yes, I'm sure he's the second coming to them. And maybe they'll pick a D ballot in the primary to vote for him. But I don't see any evidence of the people who are traditionally considered "trial attorneys" (i.e. democrats who actively donate lots of money to democrats) backing Koster. So he works for/with Tim Dollar. Big deal. Didn't the Robbs give a fundraiser for Harris recently (please correct me if I'm wrong)?
I just visited Koster's website (it's a bad habit, I know) and read this:
I joined the Republicans in 1994
Am I understanding correctly that Koster didn't join a political party until he decided to run for office at the minimum age (working the numbers here) of 26-27? I still want the story on how a guy who graduates from SLUH ends up in Belton running for Cass County Prosecutor. It's kind of difficult to ignore the potential calculation. It's great that he's been on the side of the good guys when it comes to stem cell and labor, but a man who surveys the state and decides that Cass County is his base -- I don't trust him to represent progressive values. Was he really working for Blackwell (downtown KC at that time, if memory serves) and living in Cass? As far as I'm concerned, he's already rejected KC, and I will return the favor. It'd be one thing if he was raised in Cass. But he's from the freaking LOU. And he moved to KC (St. Louis too liberal for his politics? If he got a job at Blackwell, he surely could've been hired by a big firm in St. Louis). And he moved south. Use him when you can, but I'll be damned if I support him for anything near the top of the D ticket.
At this early stage I think that Harris is the best candidate, but those are famous last words.
We all know not to be arrogant or to underestimate our competition. Koster has a certain amount of savvy and money. Donnelly has neither at this point, herself -- but she has Richard Martin on her side. And Rich is a smart cookie.
Sophia -
Did it occur to you that Koster may have attended SLUH, rather than UMKC, because it is a better law school? No political maneuvering - the dude just wanted to attend a better school.
Anonymous -
I realize that SLUH has a well-earned, tremendous reputation, but you're over-estimating it slightly. Even those of us who have the honor of being Junior Billikens need to attend another school to get our law degrees.
For those of you not following along... "SLUH" is short for "St. Louis University High School." I put that "h" in for a reason. Sounds like anon 9:30 needs to do a bit more research prior to trash talking.
Sophia and Dan -
I stand by my comment. SLUH (St. Louis University High School)is a better school than UMKC law school. Sad but true.
MATA has twice faxed the membership saying it would not endorse. Harris recently faxed out a letter with six MATA board members signing on, including past-presidents. I think you can count on MATA support being mixed.
Anon 8:36,
Thanks for standing firm in your mistake. We really need more of that in this country. I hope you take your commitment to the next level and start pushing for SLUH to get ABA accredited so that some day you may have some semblance of a point.
I'm just bummed that they closed the old Southwest High School law school. And when is Border Star going finally start offering an MBA program?
I think UMKC law school should move to Southwest high school. Then they could be the only law school in the country with a planetarium.
Folks - Sorry, but the truth is that the academics at SLUH (yes, a high school) are far more rigorous than UMKC law. An eggplant (yes, an actual vegetable) graduated from the law school last year. I was there. It was quite a sight.
Senator Jolie Justus' blog says it was $15 millionthe Republicans took from UMKC. Koster led the fight (calling the previous question or "PQ") to stop her filibuster of MOHELA. How many UMKC democrats will vote for Koster. They did the same in Columbia.
http://joliejustus.blogspot.com/2007/04/chicken-little.html
Anyone who thinks Jeff Harris has a realistic chance of winning a three way primary is either delusional or working for him
Global Labeling?
Amon Carter of the Amon Carter Museum fame in Fort Worth, Texas used to take his lunch along anytime he was forced to attend business meetings in Dallas. He hated Dallas so bad that he wouldn't contribute a few pennies to its tax base.
That kind of short sighted, non-global thinking is alive and well here in Kansas City for the Missouri Attorney Generals race.
Gerg Berg
Greg is right. What message are the Democrats sending to the other Kosters out there? You may be an R that wants to be a D, but you should stay an R because the D's will never let you in the club. This is idiotic.
And Democrats wonder why the Republicans control both houses of the General Assembly and the Guv's mansion.
Folks, your short-term thinking has long-term consequences, and will continue to do so.
Wrong, Anonymouses. What a lot of Dems are saying is that Koster is welcome in the party, but he has to do more than talk before we're ready to name him as our leader.
Koster wasn't just some Republican. He was a GOP leader in the Senate, who helped push Matt Blunt's agenda. Talk is cheap compared to actions.
We would all welcome Koster running for re-election. But we're not going to toss aside two very loyal Democrats and strong candidates for him, especially not for an office as important as Attorney General.
Koster is young, and he can have a great future in the Democratic Party, but first, he has to pay his dues -- the same ones that Harris and Donnelly have been paying for years.
He can cruise to re-election, do good work in the Senate, and then run for Skelton's seat when he retires, or even start building a campaign for Bond's seat in 2010. After Koster has walked the walk for a few years, then a lot of us will be ready to jump on board. But he has to EARN our support first.
I'm sorry but as a woman who supports getting women elected, Donnelly just doesn't do it for me. I've had the opportunity of speaking with her on several occasions. Every time we have had a chance to talk, one word comes to mind: "stoic." Koster's phony smile says it all and according to his voting record - he's a republican not a democrat.
Margaret Donnelly a fine Democrat? I don't know what being a fine Democrat is, but she certainly is a cold and calculating woman without much of a conscience. This lady as a Guardian Ad-Litem participated in such an injustice against a child and mother.
Others involved in the injustice of this child at ShreddedSociety.com included another GAL, Brian Dunlop a very corrupt and psychopathic sick man, retired, Family Court Judge, Susan Block, who is lesbian and a gay activist now attorney, friend of Family Court Commissioner, Victoria Mullin McKee whose gay brother-in-law got sole custody of his two children after he came out due to their unjust influence. Margaret Donnelly, the judges and connected attorneys in that court make up their own laws and are wolves in sheep clothing.
I have the pleasure of knowing Mr. Dunlop and Ms. Block, and they are both fine people.
Dan,
The neighbors of many serial killers also thought they were great fine people until the bodies were found buried in their basement or yards.
Not surprising that you feel as you do, afterall they both were described as wolves in sheep clothing weren't they. Whew!!
I happen to know that Brian Dunlop is a loud mouth nut that deserve to be behind bars for many of his corrupt actions.
Oh, anonymous, you are too frightened by what you hear from others. Remember, the neighbors of fine people often say that they are fine people, too.
The only persons to criticze them are gutless anonymous cowards who seem to think that homosexuality is a ground for attack.
Dan,
Are you hard of reading? Didn't I write,
I happen to know that Brian Dunlop is a loud mouth nut that deserve to be behind bars for many of his corrupt actions.
No homosexuality, nor being a lesbian are grounds for attack, but sick corrupt actions by ones who are, and that harm children are grounds for attack.
Also Dan,
How could I forget to mention that the child (5yr.old little girl)at issue at (shreddedsociety.com) was kidnapped by the State, Brian Dunlop - GAL, Margaret Donnelly - GAL, Susan Block -Judge w/out any wrong doing by the mother.
This mother had two other children and these monsters took only the little girl,that appealed to this single male stranger that the court (these monsters) allowed to adopt this little 5 year old girl.
This single male stranger had had her since she was four (4) years old. And adopted her when she was just over 5 years old.
Now this is PERVERTED, to place a child who had been sexually abused by her biological father into the custody of a single man.
This child had been sexually abused by her biological father. Mother and Father did not live together and were divorced. Mother was not found to be part of any of this tragic wrong doing.
Even without the knowledge, that sexual perversions run in the Dunlop male genes, SEE: http://www.jfcadvocacy.org/amicus-briefs/SwinnOMMJusticeforchildrenbriefS1304833.doc
and w/out knowledge that Susan Block is a lesbian. THIS IS PERVERTED!!!
They never even took away this womans two other children for even an hour, a little boy (7 yrs. old) and a teenage girl (15 yrs. old). It is nothing more than sexual enslavement of a child. Yes, child sex slaves are alive and well in our foster care system being adopted out to perverts.
Furthermore, what obviously is happeneing in our courts by certain court officials and others here in MO against some of the children enslaved into the foster care system is no better than what Sean Hornbeck fell victim to.
It can very accurately be stated that Margaret Donnelly is unfit to hold any public office or make decisions concerning anything to do with children, she is a danger to children.
Child sex slaves are alive and well everywhere, even in our foster care system, right here in MO. You think that you really know anyone, or can vouch for someone?
Even the mother did not realize that she had been married to a child molester, like most woman who have face this nightmare. All those poerverted judges and court officials around the country in the U.S. do not realize that they are married to perverts neither.
Do you not realize that some of the most respected members in our society are really just monsters, and that what you see are only a disquise?
Again with the attacks based on Block's alleged sexuality - you should be ashamed of yourself.
Grow out of Junior High, and stop dreaming your lurid dreams.
I support Jeff Harris, but reject the sick, anonymous, utterly baseless perverted fantasies being used to attack Margaret Donnelly.
Lawyers are bound by confidentiality and cannot defend themselves from creepy anonymice.
Brian Dunlop is not a fine man.
I can personally attest to the total indiffernce he displays when wreaking havoc on the young and defenseless he is paid well to protect. His judgements are quick, decisive and completely inacurate He doesn't even both to scratch the surface but goes off his own skewed perception.
He favors the father no matter what kind of abusive, drug/alcohol addicted, imbalanced person he is.
Shame on him and the court system that empowers him to ruin the lives of children and their mothers who do not have the resources to go back to court.
Dan,
This same confidentiality you speak of where children are concerned is the very thing that works in favor of corrupted attorneys and judges who cause children to become victims. Much corruption stay covered under the disguise of confidentiality, how convenient for corrupt attorneys and judges.
Now, you are not so foolish as to believe that there are no corrupt attorneys and judges are you?
Speaking of Brian Dunlop,
Remember the situation where the police officer went to prison for attempting to plant drugs on a mother, Christina Lambert and fraudulently charge this mother with use of a stolen credit card in order to sway a child custody case? The officer made claim that the father had paid him to set the mother Christina Lambert up.
Well, word is that it was actually the attorney, Guardian Ad-Litem in the case, Brian Dunlop who was the one who had actually set the scheme up with the dirty corrupted police officer. But, why did this officer keep quiet about Brian Dunlop?
The father was an ex-hockey player, ex-federal agent many years previous, but was a developer and nightclub owner of the Monkey Bar in downtown St. Louis. His father was also an ex-police officer, then developer.
By the way the father was not convicted in the case, but was sent to prison on some separate federal charges to due with fraudulent bank loan(s). It was a less than 6 mo. sentence.
But, the kicker is, that the mother unjustly lost custody of her baby and this sick, criminal father got sole custody and on top of that the mother was not even awarded any vistation of her baby because this sick father hated her that much.
The court proceedings were totally corrupted and illegal, where the mother had no money and was not represented nor notified of the court proceeding that took away all her rights where only a little over a week earlier she had won custody.
Atorney,Brian Dunlop who acted as the child's Guardian Ad-Litem pulled this quick and illegal act on the mother, setting up acourt date without her knowledge and lying about it, where he made up the lie that the mother had a dirty drug test which was not true. And of course, corrupted perverted retired Judge Joseph Goeke was always one who could be paid off where he with along with this.
In a newspaper article Judge Goeke lied stating that he knew nothing about the incident invoving the police officer attempt to set the mother up for the father, that no one had brought that information to his attention.
But, these attorneys and judges are considered respectable people when in fact they are the scum of the earth and wolves in sheep clothing. All the attorneys and judges protect these sick and corrupt court officials. Do any of them have a conscience?
I won't bother deleting this comment, even though it is the product of a gutless and sick mind, because the author will only be encouraged to make more preposterous allegations. But I encourage all readers to consider the credibility, courage and moral code of someone who would write such things in an anonymous attack.
In that situation with the mother Christina Lammert and the corrupt police officer who attempted to plant drugs on her and other fake charges, the father was William (Bill) Stallings of Ladue, MO., were Brian Dunlop was the Guardian Ad-Litem, and the court officials involved in the case suppressed it all in the record while knowing about everything.
Should I go on with examples of other fixed court cases? And dirty attorneys and judges?
Are you of the same kind as these?
There's enough facts here to see who the sick ones really are. You just refuse to acknowledge it or see it, why?
The father was a ex professional soccer player, not hockey player,
Bill Stallings. Here's an article concerning a little about the case. sadly, the mother and child became victims of corrupted and sick court officials and a sick wealthy father.
http://blogs.kansascity.com/crime_scene/files/william_stallings_convicted_developer_starts_over.pdf
Web Address got cut off, here it is again:
http://blogs.kansascity.com/crime_scene/files/william_stallings_convicted_developer_starts_over.pdf
Post a Comment
<< Home